20 minutes ago
Donate...
Our Manifesto
Our manifesto
Who governs Britain?
EU Documents
The Lisbon Treaty
That "mandate" analysed
EU Constitution - official version
Constitution analysis
Constitution Summit analysis
Building a political Europe
Myths
The seven basic myths
Good for the environment
Co-operating nation states
Europe reunited
The EU is democratic I
The EU is democratic II
Can't be a "superstate"
Keeping the peace in Europe
A free trade area?
Constitution for enlargement?
Qanagate
Blogroll
-
-
20 minutes ago
-
32 minutes ago
-
44 minutes ago
-
46 minutes ago
-
1 hour ago
-
1 hour ago
-
2 hours ago
-
2 hours ago
-
3 hours ago
-
4 hours ago
-
4 hours ago
-
5 hours ago
-
5 hours ago
-
5 hours ago
-
8 hours ago
-
9 hours ago
-
9 hours ago
-
10 hours ago
-
11 hours ago
-
17 hours ago
-
18 hours ago
-
23 hours ago
-
1 day ago
-
1 day ago
-
1 day ago
-
1 day ago
-
1 day ago
-
1 day ago
-
1 day ago
-
2 days ago
-
2 days ago
-
2 days ago
-
2 days ago
-
3 days ago
-
3 days ago
-
3 days ago
-
3 days ago
-
3 days ago
-
3 days ago
-
4 days ago
-
4 days ago
-
5 days ago
-
5 days ago
-
6 days ago
-
1 week ago
-
1 week ago
-
1 week ago
-
2 weeks ago
-
2 weeks ago
-
3 weeks ago
-
3 weeks ago
-
3 weeks ago
-
4 weeks ago
-
5 weeks ago
-
1 month ago
-
1 month ago
-
1 month ago
-
2 months ago
-
2 months ago
-
3 months ago
-
3 months ago
-
6 months ago
-
6 months ago
-
8 months ago
-
10 months ago
-
11 months ago
-
11 months ago
-
11 months ago
-
1 year ago
-
1 year ago
-
1 year ago
-
1 year ago
-
1 year ago
-
1 year ago
-
1 year ago
-
1 year ago
-
1 year ago
-
1 year ago
-
-
Climate Change
Blog Archive
-
▼
2011
(1596)
-
▼
September
(113)
- Bristol bandits
- The first ten
- Conference time
- A stealth tax on the poor
- And with one bound ...
- Not impressed
- The master of irrelevancy
- Passengers of events
- Totally domed
- From Hell, Hull and Halifax …
- They know nothing else
- When will they ever learn?
- Value for money
- Costs reasonably incurred
- Robbing the poor
- Party time
- The rule of fear
- Of no serious purpose or value
- Small disaster – many not hurt
- Non credo quia absurdum est
- Freedom of speech?
- The guilty men
- The "phantom visit" fraud
- A long time coming
- A fraud found out
- The fear factor
- A leaderless revolution
- BRADFORD Capitulates
- A predictable result
- Over a barrel
- A reason – give me a reason
- Not only necessary but a duty
- Has it started?
- A vast criminal conspiracy
- And so what?
- Not all it seems
- Unravelling the scam
- Empty vessels
- Never fails to impress
- Diversionary tactics
- 40 Prozent würden Eu-kritische Partei wählen
- The alternative plan
- The £4 million heist
- The only way out is out
- The noose tightens
- Power to the people
- Holed below the waterline
- The establishment on trial
- Everyone's an expert
- A result
- A suicide note from the centre
- News from a distant planet
- This is only the start
- The rule of law
- The Siege of Bradford – day three
- A statement of the bleedin' obvious
- Strap in tight
- Shaking the money tree
- The Siege of Bradford – day two
- The thick blue line
- Not impressed
- Dellers goes for Palin
- Taking back control
- The irony of it all
- Good advice
- Fighting back
- The Siege of Bradford
- Attacking the money tree
- The corporate enemy
- Part of the problem
- He doesn't
- The legacy
- Monuments to lunacy
- To kill a bailiff
- The thrashings of the dinosaurs
- Mencken territory
- Change of style
- A thieves' charter
- Tim's left foot
- Not the last word
- So where do we go from here?
- Taking us for fools
- The unbridgeable gap
- The charade continues
- Shocked?
- Damage to us all
- Playing with the faeries
- This is getting to be a habit
- Lawson flatulates again
- Reality calling
- It hasn't gone away
- Always last to catch on
- You read it here first
- (Mis)reading the riots
- A thought for us all
- A humiliation for Merkel
- Telegraph hacked
- A small apology
- System malfunction
- Disaffection is catching
- Justice beyond the grave
- No respect, and no policy
- Shambles upon shambles
- The end is nigh?
- A history of England
- He speaks too soon
- We're all in this together?
- Linkage
- Baby talk
- A lack of commitment?
- Loot of the day
- Europlastics
- Dark deeds and darker days
-
▼
September
(113)
At the heart of this Council Tax issue are examples such as these, this one from Basildon where the council is ripping off a widow on minimum wage, imposing charges of £45 for a summons and £50 for a liability order because the woman was late paying.
What comes over is the chilling indifference of the council official, which is positively sinister when one appreciates that the bulk of the charge is almost certainly unlawful. But then, with chief executive Bala Mahendran on an annual salary of £155,904 and the senior management team taking £987,960 – plus pension payments and bonuses – one can see why officials need to be stealing the widow's mite.
Continuing with the survey of charges made by local authorities, the latest result in is from Runnymede Borough Council, Surrey. This is a very prosperous part of the London commuter belt, with some of the most expensive housing in the UK outside of central London.
With a population of 84,000, comprising some of the richest people in the UK, it still found it necessary to extract £130,509 from 2,181 summonses and 1,626 liability orders during the last financial year – robbing some of the very poor to keep the rich fully serviced (chart above).
Looking at this in the round, though, with three results from last year to evaluate – Bradford, Ipswich and now Runnymede - I'm looking at ways of comparing the data. One such is to relate the populations to the number of liability orders issued, ratios which yield interesting results.
If we take the wealthy Runnymead, we see a ratio of 1:51. Ipswich, with its population of 122,300 and 4,803 liability orders, yields 1:25. Bradford, on the other hand, with a population of 501,700 (and they call this local government ... there are countries smaller) and 32,428 liability orders, delivers a ratio of 1:15 - essentially, one person in fifteen gets a liability order.
There are too few results yet to come to definitive conclusions, but this tiny spread certainly would support a claim that the councils are systematically robbing the poor.
COMMENT THREAD Tweet



