4 minutes ago
Donate...
Our Manifesto
Our manifesto
Who governs Britain?
EU Documents
The Lisbon Treaty
That "mandate" analysed
EU Constitution - official version
Constitution analysis
Constitution Summit analysis
Building a political Europe
Myths
The seven basic myths
Good for the environment
Co-operating nation states
Europe reunited
The EU is democratic I
The EU is democratic II
Can't be a "superstate"
Keeping the peace in Europe
A free trade area?
Constitution for enlargement?
Qanagate
Blogroll
-
-
27 minutes ago
-
45 minutes ago
-
1 hour ago
-
2 hours ago
-
2 hours ago
-
4 hours ago
-
5 hours ago
-
9 hours ago
-
9 hours ago
-
11 hours ago
-
11 hours ago
-
11 hours ago
-
14 hours ago
-
15 hours ago
-
16 hours ago
-
17 hours ago
-
17 hours ago
-
17 hours ago
-
20 hours ago
-
1 day ago
-
1 day ago
-
1 day ago
-
1 day ago
-
1 day ago
-
1 day ago
-
1 day ago
-
1 day ago
-
1 day ago
-
2 days ago
-
2 days ago
-
2 days ago
-
2 days ago
-
2 days ago
-
2 days ago
-
3 days ago
-
4 days ago
-
5 days ago
-
6 days ago
-
1 week ago
-
1 week ago
-
1 week ago
-
1 week ago
-
1 week ago
-
1 week ago
-
1 week ago
-
2 weeks ago
-
2 weeks ago
-
3 weeks ago
-
3 weeks ago
-
3 weeks ago
-
4 weeks ago
-
4 weeks ago
-
5 weeks ago
-
1 month ago
-
1 month ago
-
1 month ago
-
1 month ago
-
2 months ago
-
2 months ago
-
3 months ago
-
4 months ago
-
6 months ago
-
6 months ago
-
8 months ago
-
10 months ago
-
11 months ago
-
11 months ago
-
11 months ago
-
1 year ago
-
1 year ago
-
1 year ago
-
1 year ago
-
1 year ago
-
1 year ago
-
1 year ago
-
1 year ago
-
1 year ago
-
1 year ago
-
-
Climate Change
Blog Archive
-
▼
2012
(435)
-
▼
March
(109)
- Framing the argument
- Clever old Sun
- A jolly good thing?
- Muddying the waters
- The not-so-free market
- A real rebellion
- By-bye election
- We've been busy
- Nuke plans scrapped
- Hold the front page
- The illusion of choice
- Schools 'n' hospitals reprise
- Dying the death
- The trivia rolls on
- Muddling through is awfully jolly
- Making a mockery of themselves
- The elephant in the letter box
- The Old Swan Manifesto
- A huge political mistake
- You don't say
- Why is this news?
- Up yours, from Bradford!
- Stop thief!
- Tories for sale
- A three-pillar war – part I
- A dramatic lull
- A question of accountability
- Take your pick
- Corruption and more
- I couldn't resist this
- Something fishy
- This does not surpise me
- A walk in the park
- Death by boredom
- A muddled book
- I keep wondering
- So what Larry?
- I missed this
- The grovellers
- A sense of irritation
- The fluffy budget show
- Hypocrisy unlimited
- The big yawn
- Insult to injury
- Tories "enthusiastically supported" wartime Euro-i...
- Investing in your future
- Another reminder
- Masters of incompetence
- A gallant but futile effort
- No one is in charge
- Bring them to book
- Filtering through
- The making of a myth
- Robbing us blind
- An independent review
- Consequences
- Macho morons
- An essay in incompetence
- Water down the drain
- Modern history
- We should have expected this
- The real enemy
- Bring on the grown-ups
- Only the little people pay taxes
- From the unacceptable to the intolerable
- For interest
- A "revolution" consuming its children
- A matter of trust
- Hubris?
- Carbon suicide
- Parliament at work?
- Our thieving partners
- One for your shit list (Guest post)
- A touch of irony
- Eating my words?
- A new era of intolerance?
- The greatest enemy
- Stupid or disinegenuous?
- Armageddon deferred
- Understanding our history
- Please adjust your spellcheckers
- Nothing changes
- Next crisis please
- Back to basics
- Launch day?
- Low flying
- The source of our problems
- Self-aggrandisement
- Warrior down
- Words are hardly needed
- A defence against referendums
- Dutch eurodoom
- The cliff-edge recedes?
- The end of Merkel's Europe?
- What is the purpose?
- A cliché-rich environment
- All hail Helmer the heretic!
- Ignorance or deception?
- The wages of wind
- Lest we forget
- For what it's worth
- The slow road to madness
- Has the greenie spell broken?
- WWF in embezzlement scandal
- Springtime in Brussels
- Game changer
- The perception of great events
- Potential legal obstacles
- Mediocracy
-
▼
March
(109)
What the nationals fear to reveal, the Northern Journal makes its front page. Readers will recognise some of the content, but what is also fascinating is the obligatory comment from HMRC. It counters that "the UK has a specific exception from the zero rate for hot takeway food, and that would continue to apply". Thereby, the Treasury insists that "the decision to apply VAT to all hot foods is there to remove anomalies and not to see off an EU challenge".
These bizarre comments are almost mind-blowing. The UK does not have a "specific exemption" on the zero rate for hot takeway food. It has a derogation written into the VAT Sixth Directive which allows it to apply a zero rate to food. But it is free waive that derogation in respect of any categories of food, which is exactly what it has done with hot food.
However, what it is not free to do under the Directive, is apply a discriminatory rate, levying VAT on some hot foods and not others – or different rates on the same types of food. Thus, when the ECJ decided that the sale of hot food over the counter was the supply of goods rather than a service, HMRC was in trouble.
Up until then, it had been relying on the sale of hot foods from outlets such as ethnic takeaways and fish and chip shops being categorised as a service, attracting VAT on that account. When the ECJ decided that this was the supply of food, such outlets should have been able to apply the zero rate, but for the fallback position, where HMRC has waived its derogation for hot food and could apply VAT on this category.
But that in turn exposed a glaring anomaly in the British government's position. It is now charging VAT on hot foods rather than the service of supplying hot foods, but it is applying that tax to some foods and not others. This it is not allowed to do under EU law, so Osborne must regularise the position.
Thus to say that "the decision to apply VAT to all hot foods is there to remove anomalies and not to see off an EU challenge" is utterly bizarre. The point is that, unless the anomaly is removed, there will be an EU challenge. And, since the chancellor does not want to lose the income from takeaway shops, he is imposing the standard rate on all hot foods.
Needless to say, Osborne does not want to be seen as the weak man that he is, bending his knee to Brussels on an unpopular issue, so the Treasury is now laying down a smokscreen, which is getting close to outright lying. But at least one newspaper is seeing the light.
COMMENT: "SOMETHING FISHY" THREAD Tweet


