27 minutes ago
Donate...
Our Manifesto
Our manifesto
Who governs Britain?
EU Documents
The Lisbon Treaty
That "mandate" analysed
EU Constitution - official version
Constitution analysis
Constitution Summit analysis
Building a political Europe
Myths
The seven basic myths
Good for the environment
Co-operating nation states
Europe reunited
The EU is democratic I
The EU is democratic II
Can't be a "superstate"
Keeping the peace in Europe
A free trade area?
Constitution for enlargement?
Qanagate
Blogroll
-
-
28 minutes ago
-
38 minutes ago
-
2 hours ago
-
3 hours ago
-
4 hours ago
-
4 hours ago
-
4 hours ago
-
4 hours ago
-
6 hours ago
-
6 hours ago
-
7 hours ago
-
9 hours ago
-
12 hours ago
-
14 hours ago
-
15 hours ago
-
15 hours ago
-
16 hours ago
-
23 hours ago
-
1 day ago
-
1 day ago
-
1 day ago
-
1 day ago
-
1 day ago
-
1 day ago
-
1 day ago
-
1 day ago
-
1 day ago
-
1 day ago
-
2 days ago
-
2 days ago
-
2 days ago
-
2 days ago
-
3 days ago
-
3 days ago
-
3 days ago
-
3 days ago
-
3 days ago
-
5 days ago
-
1 week ago
-
1 week ago
-
1 week ago
-
1 week ago
-
1 week ago
-
1 week ago
-
1 week ago
-
2 weeks ago
-
2 weeks ago
-
3 weeks ago
-
3 weeks ago
-
3 weeks ago
-
4 weeks ago
-
4 weeks ago
-
5 weeks ago
-
1 month ago
-
1 month ago
-
1 month ago
-
1 month ago
-
2 months ago
-
2 months ago
-
3 months ago
-
4 months ago
-
6 months ago
-
6 months ago
-
8 months ago
-
10 months ago
-
11 months ago
-
11 months ago
-
11 months ago
-
1 year ago
-
1 year ago
-
1 year ago
-
1 year ago
-
1 year ago
-
1 year ago
-
1 year ago
-
1 year ago
-
1 year ago
-
1 year ago
-
-
Climate Change
Blog Archive
-
▼
2010
(1372)
-
▼
September
(77)
- On being prepared
- Rewriting history
- You too can have one
- Belgian minesweeping
- I really do hope
- A cold wind doth blow
- Oh dear
- I should not do this
- Thrice strange
- He's right
- The £100,000 cleaning bill
- A bloody disgrace
- Shouting out loud
- Wholesale micturition
- Too close to call
- Queenie – meet Charlie
- A rat is smelt
- The scam spreads
- It's not them, it's us
- The heart rejoices
- Snatch to be replaced
- The House of Pachauri
- Too many examples
- Sodden and limp
- It's dead
- Is this man an imposter?
- Another great victory
- I think I've been saying this
- Stuff them
- Rub-a-dub-scrub
- Hospitals on hills
- No getting away from it
- Of bald men and combs
- And so it starts
- Read this and weep
- Meaningless data
- Yes, but!
- Why it matters today
- Your foreign service
- Didn't we do well!
- A change of wind
- They missed it
- The myth has taken over
- A bit of sense
- And yet more stupidity
- Nothing quite so stupid as a Tory
- The art of propaganda
- Who governs Britain?
- They lied
- Down the green plug hole
- No more Mr Nice Person
- No longer simple solutions
- Who he?
- Our profound hope
- Going nowhere
- Not defeatism, realism
- Day 61 - Battle of Britain
- What more can you say?
- The fluffheads have taken over
- State of the Union
- The Blitz remembered
- A pretend crisis
- Oh for the good old days
- That fool Dannatt
- For every action
- A crude characterisation
- This dying creed
- The real scandal?
- North talks
- Al Gore lied, James Lee died
- Above the line
- Wages of stupidity
- The obvious question
- Declining standards
- My Goodness
- A Continuation of Policy
- Missing the point
-
▼
September
(77)
Day 63 is now posted - in part. I'm playing my usual trick of starting with a short post, to which I will add over the period, so that it will end up looking very different from what it does today.
I've made a small, but significant change to day 58 (5th September) where I find that not only did Churchill not mention Hitler's threat to raze British cities, neither did The Times. Yet that very issue was sufficiently newsworthy for the New York Times to have used it for its front-page headline.
You have to admit that it is a little odd that, when the German dictator makes such an overt and very public threat, the prime minister of the UK doesn't even mention it in a Commons speech and the newspaper of record does not refer to it in its own news story which covers Hitler's speech. I must now find how other newspapers treated the story. (If anyone has copies of any national newspapers for 5 September 1940, I would certainly like to know about it).
Howsoever, with the current piece, that now makes 63 daily posts on a single subject, without a break – that has to be a personal record! And, to maintain a sense of immediacy, I do not write the day's piece until the day actually arrives. With another 51 days yet to go, it is going to be interesting to see whether I can last the course (without cheating).
Living with the Battle of Britain day-on-day, though, it is inevitable that it should dominate my thoughts and find plenty of references in my other posts, and it is also inevitable that one should hanker after the rather direct and beguilingly simple solutions to some problems - you simply loaded up some bombers and sent them on a delivery errand.
Certainly, that would be an extremely attractive solution to this sort of idiocy, where we have Lord Adair Turner, Chairman of the Committee on Climate Change (CCC), in full spate again.
He is saying that the UK is likely to miss the target unless there is massive investment in wind, wave and solar. And he has also written a "strongly-worded" letter to another idiot, Chris Huhne, the energy and climate change minister. Needless to say, he is calling for the government to "ramp up" efforts to build turbines both on land and at sea.
Just one aircraft, one teensy-weensy bomb, suitably and accurately targeted, and we could be rid of both idiots in one fell swoop. All we have to do is wait for them to meet.
But such are the complexities of the modern world that we can no longer do such things – unless of course, your targets are "ragheads" in a foreign land and you proclaim yourself to be saving the free world from al Qaeda. Then, it seems, you can slaughter a considerable number of people a lot more innocent than Turner and Huhne, and walk away without a stain of your character.
No longer simple solutions though – we will have to look for a different but equally permanent answer.
COMMENT THREAD Tweet


